Vocation in the Valley

“U” in United Nations Should Stand for Useless

The U.N. Security Council is expected to pass a resolution condemning the attacks in London. Resolution? Expected? WTF, this is wrong on so many levels.

1. These guys need a resolution to say they condemn the action? If you have to say your against these actions, does that mean someone might have thought you were for them? If a family member gets mugged, do you put out a resolution that you are against mugging?
2. They need to meet to do this? I guess they don’t want to use a form letter, but c’mon. If they have to have a meeting so they can word the resolution as to not offend people, what are they trying to say?
3. These resolutions are sooo effective. Similar ones were made after September 11 and the Madrid bombings. I’m sure this one will do just as much to stop terrorism.

This entry was posted on Sunday, September 11th, 2005 at 12:47 am and is filed under Citizen. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.